Current:Home > FinanceWisconsin Assembly approves a bill mandating a limit on the wolf population, sends proposal to Evers -FinanceCore
Wisconsin Assembly approves a bill mandating a limit on the wolf population, sends proposal to Evers
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 17:34:23
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Republicans sent a bill to Gov. Tony Evers on Thursday that would mandate state wildlife managers set a cap on the state’s wolf population, forcing the governor to choose between pleasing conservationists who want to protect the creatures and farmers who say wolves are destroying their livestock.
The Assembly passed the bill on a voice vote with no debate. The Senate approved it in October. Evers will have to decide whether to sign it into law or veto it. His spokesperson, Britt Cudaback, didn’t immediately respond to a message asking where Evers stands on the proposal.
The state Department of Natural Resources, an Evers cabinet agency, adopted a wolf management plan in October that didn’t include a hard cap. The plan instead recommended keeping the population at around 1,000 animals.
The plan replaced a management plan the DNR adopted in 1999 that set a hard cap of 350 wolves. DNR officials have argued the new approach gives wildlife managers more flexibility.
The new plan pleased at least some environmentalists who argue that wolves haven’t firmly reestablished themselves in Wisconsin. Decades of hunting rendered wolves all but extinct in the state by the 1950s. Today the population stands at around 1,200 wolves, according to DNR estimates.
Residents and farmers across northern Wisconsin maintain that wolves have become so abundant that they’re attacking their livestock and menacing children and pets. They have demanded a hard population cap in the new management plan.
Wolves are currently listed on the federal endangered species list and cannot be hunted. But if federal officials ever delist them the DNR would be forced under state law to hold a wolf hunt. The population cap would then come into play as DNR officials consider how many wolves hunters could kill. The lower the cap, the more wolves hunters could harvest.
Republican legislators have sided with their constituents in the north, calling repeatedly on the DNR to adopt a hard cap to no avail. Republicans who control the state Senate refused to confirm four Evers appointees to the agency’s board in October after they hedged on whether they support a hard cap.
Not all conservationists support the new management plan. The Great Lakes Wildlife Alliance, also known as Friends of the Wisconsin Wolf & Wildlife, filed a lawsuit in November accusing DNR board members of violating the state’s open meetings law during the run-up to adoption, not considering the dangers of overhunting wolves and allowing unverified accounts of wolf aggression to influence the plan.
The lawsuit is still pending in Dane County Circuit Court.
veryGood! (175)
Related
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- The Wood Pellet Business is Booming. Scientists Say That’s Not Good for the Climate.
- Bama Rush Deep-Dives Into Sorority Culture: Here's Everything We Learned
- Titan submersible maker OceanGate faced safety lawsuit in 2018: Potential danger to passengers
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Many people living in the 'Diabetes Belt' are plagued with medical debt
- Obama family's private chef dead after paddle boarding accident at Martha's Vineyard
- Let's go party ... in space? First Barbie dolls to fly in space debut at Smithsonian museum
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Accidental shootings by children keep happening. How toddlers are able to fire guns.
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Critically endangered twin cotton-top tamarin monkeys the size of chicken eggs born at Disney World
- How Nick Cannon Addressed Jamie Foxx's Absence During Beat Shazam Premiere
- Two doctors struck by tragedy in Sudan: One dead, one fleeing for his life
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Is there a 'healthiest' soda? Not really, but there are some alternatives you should consider.
- Back pain shouldn't stop you from cooking at home. Here's how to adapt
- Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Climate Change Threatens 60% of Toxic Superfund Sites, GAO Finds
A first-generation iPhone sold for $190K at an auction this week. Here's why.
Why Are Some Big Utilities Embracing Small-Scale Solar Power?
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
A decoder that uses brain scans to know what you mean — mostly
How abortion ban has impacted Mississippi one year after Roe v. Wade was overturned
Coal Miner Wins Black Lung Benefits After 14 Years, Then U.S. Government Bills Him